Home prices can’t keep rising this quickly forever. That’s what Realtor magazine is reporting that CNBC is reporting that NAR has said. (I know, right?)
Here’s the deal: In May, NAR reported that home prices were up 15.4 percent from the year before. And that marked six months of those kind of double-digit price jumps. Said NAR’s chief economist Lawrence Yun, "[I]t cannot continue."
Which, of course, makes perfect sense, and (hopefully) no one is expecting it to continue. Prices are shooting up for several reasons, none of which will apply forever.
Realtors reading about a CoreLogic story were quick to call shenanigans, making for an amusing read.
In a round table discussion on mortgage fraud, Matthias Blume, senior director of analytics for CoreLogic, discussed a circumstance where a distressed homeowner poured cat urine on the rug so potential buyers are less inclined to make an offer.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. The home was being short-sold and the homeowners were not happy.
Mortgage rates plummeted last week… er, sorry. I mean "mortgage rates dropped slightly last week." Either way, average mortgage rates in the country were down a bit — the first drop in six weeks.
30-year fixed went from 3.98 percent to 3.93 percent (with 0.8 point; I’m still trying to find out how typical 0.8 point is.)
15-year fixed went from 3.10 percent to 3.04 percent (with an average 0.7 point).
Why bother sharing this? We haven’t talked about mortgage rates in a while, is all. They’re still amazingly low, but have been inching up.
FannieMae reported that “American’s confidence in their ability to buy and sell their home climbed sharply in May, “according to their Monthly National Housing Survey. The large boost in pace of residential sales from April to May, according to the Virginia Home Sales Report, suggests that Virginians are equally confident. The latest Virginia unemployment rate is 5.2%, much lower than the US rate which was at 7.6% last month. In fact, the Virginia rate is among the 10 lowest in the nation and the lowest in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions. Low unemployment isn’t the only reason to be confident. The median sales p
For the first time since 2006, a survey of the nation’s homebuilders found them with a positive outlook about the market. It’s not scientific, but it’s still nice to see.
The Economist took a look at Standard & Poor’s housing data and concluded that there probably isn’t a housing bubble at the moment. And when you see the charts you can see why.
For example, if you start at the end of 1987 (giving it a value of "100"), here is what real house prices look like.
Once upon a time there were two shamans in a tribe. They both tried to predict how bad the upcoming winter would be. One threw rabbit bones and predicted a harsh winter. The other threw squirrel bones and predicted a mild winter.
The winter was mild, thus proving that throwing squirrel bones was a more accurate way of predicting the weather.
In an unrelated note, there is some speculation that we might be starting to inflate a new housing bubble, as prices are rising more quickly than is typical.
So, are we? Is there a bubble growing?
There are people who insist either yes or no, and have the bones data to prove it. I’m not going down that road. But it’s worth considering the
There are a handful of tax breaks for homeowners who improve the energy efficiency of their homes — essentially, the government reduces your taxes if you make your house greener.
Now a bill introduced in the Senate by senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) would give a different kind of incentive — it would require lenders to take into account the energy-efficient features of a home when calculating a borrower’s income/expense ratio.
Essentially, it would allow buyers to qualify for a larger loan or a better rate if a home is energy efficient.
The National Flood Insurance Program was in the black until Hurricane Katrina; since then it’s been in debt to the tune of about $20 billion. (Which, of course, illustrates why it’s a government program and not offered by private insurers.)
So in 2012 Congress reformed the program to try to keep it from bleeding money.
For example, homes built before 1968 — when the NFIP started — were given lower, "grandfathered" rates. Those are going to be phased out. And homeowners living where the danger of flooding is so extreme that insurance is unaffordable were given subsidies to pay for it. (Yes, that’s correct. People living in the most-flood prone areas were given lower insurance rates.) Those subsidies are also going to be removed.